In the world of cross-border business—whether it’s e-commerce operations, ad tracking, web scraping, or account management—proxy IPs are a vital part of the technical stack. In use cases that demand high-speed access and stable performance, but where ultra-high anonymity is not essential, datacenter proxies offer a low-cost and fast solution that many teams prefer.
However, with so many providers on the market, the quality of datacenter proxy services can vary significantly. This article breaks down the basics, advantages, limitations, and ideal use cases for datacenter proxies. It also presents a hands-on comparison of two popular services—Blurpath and Oxylabs—to help you find the best fit for your needs.
What Are Datacenter Proxies?
Datacenter proxies are IP addresses not assigned by Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but instead generated by third-party cloud services or internet data centers (IDCs). These are non-residential IPs and don’t carry any behavioral signals of real human users or households.
Their affordability, high speed, and flexibility make them a common choice for large-scale scraping, automation, and multi-account operations in cross-border digital business.
Key Features of Datacenter Proxies:
- Cost-Effective: Compared to residential or mobile proxies, datacenter proxies are significantly cheaper, making them ideal for users with high-volume IP needs but limited budgets.
- Fast and Scalable: Located in top-tier data centers with strong backbone connections, they offer high bandwidth and low latency, supporting large-scale concurrent requests.
- Lower Anonymity: These IPs can be flagged as bot traffic by strict platforms (Google, Meta, TikTok) because they lack residential behavior patterns.
- Ideal for Specific Tasks: While less stealthy than residential proxies, they’re stable and effective for non-authenticated use cases like SEO scraping, price tracking, and ad verification.
When to Use Datacenter Proxies
Datacenter proxies are not one-size-fits-all. Below are scenarios where they shine:
- E-commerce Data Collection: Bulk scraping of product listings, inventory, or pricing from platforms like Amazon, Lazada, Ozon.
- SEO Monitoring: Track keyword rankings, search visibility, and domain authority across regions.
- Ad Testing and Verification: Check how ads appear in different locations and on different devices.
- Web Performance Monitoring: Simulate user load for uptime checks or page speed audits using non-residential traffic.
⚠️ Keep in mind: datacenter proxies are best for speed and scale, not for identity-sensitive actions. They’re not suitable for tasks involving logins on platforms with strong anti-bot defenses.
In-Depth Comparison: Blurpath vs Oxylabs
To help cross-border businesses make informed decisions, we tested Blurpath and Oxylabs across five key dimensions:
1. IP Quality and Stability
- Blurpath: Offers clean, reliable IPs with clearly sourced infrastructure. Stable during scraping and e-commerce tasks, with minimal failure or blocking. Excellent choice for multi-account use and mid-sized operations.
- Oxylabs: Slightly more robust under extreme concurrent request loads. Maintains high success rates for users with demanding uptime needs.
2. Response Time
- Blurpath: Delivers strong latency performance across Asia. Average response times are under 100ms, with slightly higher latency in Europe and North America—but still within acceptable ranges.
- Oxylabs: Reliable response times across major global nodes, though some less popular regions may be slower. Best optimized for US/EU regions.
3. IP Type and Anonymity
- Blurpath: Standard datacenter IPs supporting HTTPS and SOCKS5. Offers moderate anonymity, suitable for platforms with mild to moderate anti-bot measures.
- Oxylabs: Provides both static datacenter IPs and ISP-hosted IPs, offering a slightly higher level of anonymity and resistance to IP fingerprinting.
4. Geographic Coverage
- Blurpath: Offers access to 200+ countries and regions. Especially strong in Southeast Asia and North America. Excellent for localized e-commerce testing.
- Oxylabs: Covers most developed regions with city-level targeting, focused heavily on North America and Europe.
5. Ease of Use and Deployment
- Blurpath: Clean, user-friendly dashboard in English and Chinese. Supports batch provisioning, grouping, bandwidth control. Perfect for non-technical users or small teams looking to deploy quickly.
- Oxylabs: Offers a powerful API suite and professional-grade controls. However, the interface is more technical, with a steeper learning curve for beginners.
Hands-On Recommendations
- Blurpath: Ideal for e-commerce sellers, overseas ad teams, and multi-account operators. It combines affordability, solid Asia-Pacific infrastructure, and simple deployment. Great for businesses needing reliable proxies with minimal technical setup.
- Oxylabs: Best suited for large-scale deployments with high concurrency and stricter privacy requirements—particularly in Western markets.
Final Thoughts
Datacenter proxies remain a practical and cost-effective option in many cross-border business workflows. Their speed, scalability, and affordability make them a go-to solution for scraping, monitoring, and automation—provided you understand their limits.
By comparing top providers like Blurpath and Oxylabs, it’s clear that users should match proxy features to their business context, platform restrictions, and risk tolerance. A smart choice avoids wasted spend and unlocks real efficiency.
👉 Ready to scale your scraping or automation tasks?
Explore datacenter and residential proxy solutions at Blurpath.
Global Residential Proxies by Proxyxyz 
Leave a comment